Assessment of mouth breathing by Speech-Language Pathologists: an international Delphi consensus.

PURPOSE: mouth breathing (MB) has detrimental effects on children's growth. Diagnosis of MB is possible through a multidisciplinary approach including Speech-Language Pathologist's (SLP) assessment; however, SLPs currently have little to no defined selection criteria to determine the awake and habitual breathing pattern. This study aims at identifying relevant criteria for the assessment of the habitual and awake breathing pattern of preschool children, and developing a grid that would help SLPs diagnose MB in their clinical practice. METHODS: A three-rounded online international Delphi process was conducted to achieve a consensus on the relevant items and their interpretation. Agreement was established through a Content Validity Ratio calculation. Based on the agreed items, we developed a grid through a scoring function. RESULTS: Observing the child at rest (i.e., time spent with an open/closed mouth and position of the tongue/lips) was considered the most important criterion. The experts also considered that observing the breathing pattern while chewing (open/closed mouth) and after swallowing (i.e., air intake and open/ closed mouth just after swallowing) should provide relevant but secondary information in decision-making. We were able to establish a clinical grid based on those criteria. CONCLUSION: The Delphi procedure provided content-valid criteria and conditions of observation for the myofunctional SLP assessment of the awake and habitual breathing pattern in preschoolers. A clinical validation of the developed prototype grid should be conducted in preschool children to explore its effectiveness in the diagnosis of MB.

Patência nasal em crianças respiradoras orais / Nasal patency in mouth breathing children

RESUMO Vários estudos mostram a importância da avaliação quantitativa na patência nasal e do estado funcional das vias aéreas superiores para fornecer informações clínicas e diagnósticas em indivíduos respiradores orais, as quais são de grande interesse para a fonoaudiologia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da irrigação de solução salina nasal nas vias aéreas superiores através da aeração nasal e rinomanometria anterior ativa em crianças respiradoras orais. Estudo de série de oito casos, realizado em crianças com idades entre 7 e 10 anos, com diagnóstico clínico otorrinolaringológico de respiração oral. O estudo consistiu em três etapas: avaliação inicial; intervenção e avaliação final. Foram aplicados os questionários do Índice de Identificação dos Sinais e Sintomas da Respiração Oral e qualidade de vida específica para doenças em pacientes pediátricos com queixas sinonasais. Realizaram-se as avaliações da aeração nasal e o exame da rinomanometria anterior ativa. A intervenção foi realizada por meio da irrigação de solução salina nasal com 10 ml. Em seguida, os pacientes foram reavaliados pela avaliação da aeração nasal e rinomanometria, para comparar os resultados. Em relação à avaliação da aeração nasal e rinomanometria, das 16 medidas comparativas entre pré e pós-irrigação nasal, constataram-se mudanças significativas na aeração nasal e na resistência nasal. A irrigação nasal resultou em melhora nas medidas da aeração nasal, enquanto para o fluxo nasal da rinomanometria, as medidas permaneceram inalteradas entre pré e pós-irrigação nasal.

ABSTRACT Several studies have shown the importance of quantitative assessment in nasal patency and functional status of the upper airways to provide clinical and diagnostic information in oral breather individuals, which are of great interest to speech therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of nasal saline solution irrigation on the upper airways through nasal aeration and active anterior rhinomanometry in oral breathing children. This was an eight case series study, carried out in children aged 7 to 10 years with an otorhinolaryngological clinical diagnosis of mouth breathing. The study consisted of three stages: (I) initial evaluation; (II) intervention; and (III) final evaluation. The questionnaires of the Index for the Identification of Oral Breathing Signs and Symptoms and disease-specific quality of life in pediatric patients with sinonasal complaints were applied, nasal aeration assessments and the anterior active rhinomanometry exam were carried out. The intervention was performed by irrigating nasal saline solution with 10ml. Afterwards, they were re-evaluated by nasal aeration evaluation and rhinomanometry to compare the results. Regarding nasal aeration and rhinomanometry evaluation, from the 16 comparative measurements between pre and post nasal irrigation, we obtained significant changes in nasal aeration and nasal resistance. Nasal irrigation resulted in improvement in nasal aeration measurements while nasal flow measurements from rhinomanometry remained unchanged considering pre and post nasal irrigation.

Factors related to mouth breathing syndrome in preschool children and the effects of incompetent lip seal: An exploratory study.

OBJECTIVES: A set of orofacial signs and symptoms completely or partially present in individuals who replace the correct pattern of nasal breathing with an oral or mixed pattern is defined as mouth breathing syndrome (MBS). In a previous report, it was clarified that an incompetent lip seal (ILS) affected the occurrence of MBS among primary school children. However, the factors related to MBS and the effect of ILS in preschool children remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the factors relevant to MBS in preschool children and investigate the relationship of ILS to MBS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We surveyed 285 preschool children between 3 and 5 years of age. Their guardians completed the questionnaire, which consisted of 44 questions regarding the children's daily health conditions and lifestyle habits. To classify the closely related questions into their respective factors and to examine the strength of the correlation between the newly revealed factors, an exploratory factor analysis with promax rotation was performed. RESULTS: The factor analysis identified nine items representing four factors. Factors 1-4 were defined as "diseases of the nose," "ILS," "problem with swallowing and chewing," and "eating and drinking habits," respectively. Factor 2 most strongly correlated with Factor 1, and both Factors showed a relatively strong correlation with Factor 3. CONCLUSIONS: The initial stage of MBS may be present in preschool children. ILS and diseases of the nose can cause poor development of oral functions, such as breathing and eating.

Specific dento-craniofacial characteristics in non-syndromic children can predispose to sleep-disordered breathing.

AIM: To ascertain and illustrate specific clinical dento-craniofacial characteristics associated with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in non-syndromic children. METHODS: Narrative review of literature on SDB, dental occlusion and craniofacial morphology retrieved through online literature database search for these terms. The review focused on clinical examples and graphical illustrations in order to ascertain the association between dento-craniofacial characteristics and SDB. Only publications concerning healthy non-syndromic children without any somatic or psychological diagnosis were included. RESULTS: Dento-craniofacial characteristics such as anterior open bite, large overjet, cross bite and facial appearance such as convex profile due to mandibular retrognathia and inclination, narrow and high palate can predispose to SDB in non-syndromic children. Furthermore, extended head posture, mouth breathing and general adenoidal face may be symptoms or predisposing factors to SDB in non-syndromic children. CONCLUSION: Dento-craniofacial characteristics as anterior open bite, large overjet due to mandibular retrognathia, cross bite, and narrow and high palate can predispose to SDB in non-syndromic children. Facial characteristics predisposing to SDB can be a convex facial profile, extended head posture, mouth breathing and general adenoidal face. Interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and dentists can prove valuable in diagnostics, prevention and treatment of SDB in non-syndromic children.

Trastorns respiratoris obstructius del son: necessitat d’un enfocament precoç i interdisciplinari / Trastornos respiratorios obstructivos del sueño: necesidad de un enfoque precoz e interdisciplinario / Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing: the need for an early and interdisciplinary approach

Fonament. Els trastorns respiratoris obstructius del son (TROS) són un gradient de patologies extremament infradiagnosticades malgrat la seva alta prevalença, en especial als països industrialitzats. La necessitat d’una deteccióprecoç i d’un tractament en equip interdisciplinari han fet que el nombre de publicacions de totes les especialitatsrelacionades no hagi parat de créixer en l’última dècada.És per això que creiem necessària una revisió de la bibliografia publicada fins al moment, que ens permeti tenir unavisió més global i donar recomanacions a l’hora de diagnosticar i tractar aquests trastorns.Objectiu. Conèixer la fisiopatologia, els signes i símptomes més característics, i les tècniques de diagnòstic, prevenció i tractament descrits fins al moment en relació amb els TROS.Mètode. Revisió de la bibliografia internacional publicada per totes les especialitats involucrades, fins al 2020.Resultats. Existeix una àmplia bibliografia que tracta sobre la fisiopatologia, el diagnòstic i el tractament des del punt de vista de les diferents especialitats. Encara avui és un tema d’actualitat científica bastant desconegut i malauradament poc present en la pràctica pediàtrica diària.Conclusions. Els trastorns respiratoris obstructius del sontenen un impacte directe o indirecte en l’evolució correcta dels infants. La col·laboració de totes les especialitats pediàtriques per prevenir-los, detectar-los i tractar-los abans dels 5 anys és imprescindible. (AU)

Fundamento. Los trastornos respiratorios obstructivos del sueño (TROS) son un gradiente de patologías extremadamente infradiagnosticadas a pesar de su alta prevalencia, especialmente en lospaíses industrializados. La necesidad de una detección precoz y un tratamiento en equipo interdisciplinar han hecho que el número de publicaciones de todas las especialidades relacionadas no haya parado de crecer en la última década. Por ello, creemos necesaria una revisión de la bibliografía publicada hasta el momento, que nos permita tener una visión más global y dar recomendaciones a la hora de diagnosticar y tratar estos trastornos.Objetivo. Conocer la fisiopatología, los signos y síntomas más característicos, y las técnicas de diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento descritas hasta el momento en relación con los TROS.Método. Revisión de la bibliografía internacional publicada por todas las especialidades involucradas, hasta 2020.Resultados. Existe una amplia bibliografía sobre la fisiopatología,diagnóstico y tratamiento, desde el punto de vista de las diferentes especialidades. Aún hoy, es un tema de actualidad científica bastante desconocido y desgraciadamente poco presente en la práctica pediátrica diaria.Conclusiones. Los trastornos respiratorios obstructivos del sueño tienen un impacto directo o indirecto en la correcta evolución de los niños. La colaboración de todas las especialidades pediátricas para prevenirlos, detectarlos y tratarlos antes de los 5 años es imprescindible. (AU)

Background. Obstructive Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) includes a spectrum of extremely underdiagnosed sleep disorders despite their high prevalence, particularly in industrialized countries.The need for early detection and interdisciplinary treatment has resulted in a significant increase in the number of published papers from all related specialties over the last decade. For this reason, a review of the literature published so far may be necessary to provide a more comprehensive perspective and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders.Objective. To describe the pathophysiology, the most characteristic signs and symptoms, and the diagnosis, prevention and treatment techniques described so far related to SDB.Method. Review of the published literature on the subject at an international level, from the point of view of all the specialties involved, until 2020.Results. There is extensive scientific literature about the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of SDB. It is still a subject of active scientific discussion, but with little knowledge and awareness in the daily paediatric practice.Conclusions. Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing may have a direct or indirect impact on the growth and development of dren. A multidisciplinary approach is critical to prevent, diagnose and treat SDB before the age of five. (AU)

Comparison between rhinometric variables and nasal airing in children with mouth breathing

ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the correlation between the values of nasal aeration and geometry of the nasal cavities, before and after nasal cleansing in children with mouth breathing. Methods: 20 children aged 4 to 12 years old were chosen. The questionnaire Identification Index of Signs and Symptoms of Oral breathing was applied and nasal patency was assessed by nasal aeration, through the Altmann graded mirror, and the nasal geometry measured by acoustic rhinometry. After nasal cleansing and massage, the same aeration measurements and nasal geometry procedures were performed. Group normality was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test considering the hypothesis of normal distribution whenever p>0.05. The Spearman's test was applied to analyze the correlation between variables (p<0.05). Results: there was a strong and significant correlation between nasal aeration and the corresponding cross-sectional area of the front of the inferior turbinate (CSA2) in the left cavity before cleansing. There were no correlations between the nasal aeration and other rhinometric variables. Conclusion: there was a correlation between nasal aeration values and the anterior portion of the turbinates, before the massage and nasal cleansing technique, in mouth breathing children. There were no significant differences when the nasal aeration was correlated with other rhinometric variables.

Correlation Between Palatal Depth and Duration of Upper Airway Obstruction Since Diagnosis in Children

Abstract Objective: To analyze the correlation between palatal depth and duration of the upper airway obstruction since diagnosis among children with habitual mouth breathing. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted using the consecutive sampling method on boys and girls who were habitual mouth breathers and presented with allergic rhinitis, adenoid hypertrophy, obstructive sleep apnea, rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyp. Information about the duration of upper airway obstruction was obtained from the medical records of the patients. The patients divided into two groups: those diagnosed with upper airway obstruction for < 4 years, and those diagnosed with upper airway obstruction for > 4 years. Hard palate measurements were obtained from upper arch study models using a caliper with a precision of ± 0,1 mm Results: A strong positive correlation was noted between the duration of the upper airway obstruction since diagnosis and palatal depth in children (r=0.623; p<0.05). Furthermore, the depth of the palates was found to be greater than 40 mm when the duration of upper airway obstruction since diagnosis was more than four years Conclusion: The finding of this study indicates that upper airway obstruction can result in high palates in children with habitual mouth breathing.

Proposal for a screening questionnaire for detecting habitual mouth breathing, based on a mouth-breathing habit score.

BACKGROUND: When mouth breathing becomes habitual, it can cause sleep disorders and abnormal maxillofacial growth, thus early detection of habitual mouth breathing is important. We created a questionnaire for early detection of habitual mouth breathing using a score based on a spectrum of factors found to be characteristic of mouth breathers. METHODS: First, a draft 50-question questionnaire was given to 101 random dental clinic patients, classified by dental professionals into habitual mouth breathers (n = 28) and nose breathers (n = 73). The 10 questions that significantly differentiated mouth and nose breathers (p < 0.05) were identified from this questionnaire. These questions, regarding nasal obstruction, open mouth at rest, awareness of mouth breathing, gum swelling and dental staining of the front teeth, bad breath, maxillary protrusion, nasal obstruction in childhood, bottle-feeding, and history of asthma, formed the basis for a second questionnaire. This second survey was completed by another 242 participants, separately classified into mouth breathing (n = 26), suspected mouth breathing (n = 40), and nose breathing groups (n = 176). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the resulting mouth breathing habit scores, representing the responses to the 10-question survey, showed moderate checklist diagnosability. Sensitivity of cut-off values was 61.5% (specificity 92.0%) for the mouth-breathing group, and 77.5% (specificity 56.3%) for the suspected mouth-breathing group. Information was also obtained from visual assessment of maxillofacial characteristics. We found that the mouth-breathing and suspected mouth-breathing groups showed significantly high odds ratios for 7 items: discomfort while breathing and increased chin muscle tonus with lip closure, maxillary protrusion, tongue thrust, open mouth at rest, open bite, and childhood asthma. For 94.6% of the nose breathing group, ≥1 of these items applied. CONCLUSIONS: These findings were then used together to create a sample screening form. We believe that screening of this kind can facilitate more accurate diagnosis of habitual mouth breathing and contribute to its early detection.

Variables associated with mouth breathing diagnosis in children based on a multidisciplinary assessment.

PURPOSE: : This study was conducted to identify variables associated with mouth breathing diagnosis in children, based on multidisciplinary domains. METHODS: 119 children, six to 12 years old, underwent anamnesis, speech therapy (orofacial structures and stomatognathic functions), otorhinolaryngologic (OTRL) with clinical and endoscopic examinations, dental (occlusion) and physiotherapy (body posture and nasal patency) assessments. Nasal patency was evaluated using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. A multiple logistic regression was performed considering breathing mode as the dependent variable and the co-variables from each multidisciplinary assessment as associated variables. RESULTS: Association with MB diagnosis was found in each professional domain with: nasal obstruction report (Odds ratio - OR=5.55), time of pacifier use (OR=1.25), convex facial type (OR=3.78), obtuse nasal angle (OR=4.30), half-open or open lip posture (OR=4.13), tongue position on the mouth floor (OR=5.88), reduced hard palate width (OR=2.99), unexpected contraction during mastication (OR=2.97), obstructive pharyngeal tonsils (OR=8.37), Angle Class II malocclusion (OR=10.85) and regular gingival maintenance (OR=2.89). CONCLUSION: We concluded that a multidisciplinary diagnosis is important, given that each evaluation domain, including OTRL, dental and speech therapy, presented variables associated with MB diagnosis. Body posture and nasal patency variables were not associated with MB.

Relationship between Asthma, Malocclusion and Mouth Breathing in Primary Health Care Children

Objective: To assess the relationship between asthma, malocclusion and mouth breathing. Material and Methods: This investigation was a cross-sectional study of 228 children between 6 and 12 years of age, of whom 112 were asthmatic and 116 were not, performed in two Primary Health Units of Porto Alegre, Brazil. The assessment consisted of a mouth exam performed by two calibrated dentists, an interview with parents/caregivers and medical chart data. Mouth breathing was determined through oral-facial changes related to Mouth Breathing Syndrome. Occlusion was assessed according to Angle's Classification for permanent or mixed teeth and regarding primary teeth were based on the canine relationships. The data were assessed by the Chi-square test and Poisson regression, with robust variation, at a p<0.05 significant level. Results: Asthma [PR = 2.12 (95% CI: 1.46-3.08), p<0.001] and the use of pacifiers [PR = 1.98 (95% CI: 1.27-3.07), p<0.001] were associated with mouth breathing, in the final multivariate model. Age [PR = 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00-1.03), p=0.039] and thumb sucking [PR = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03-1.13), p=0.001] were associated with malocclusion in the final multivariate model, while there was no relationship between asthma and malocclusion (PR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). Conclusion: This study provides evidence of the relationship between asthma and mouth breathing in children, demonstrating that knowledge regarding the oral health of populations with chronic diseases is fundamental for developing health programmes suitable to their needs and risks.

Mouth Breathing and Prevalence of Sleep Bruxism among Preschoolers aged 2 to 5 years

Objective: To determine the prevalence of bruxism, associating it with mouth breathing in preschool children in Florianopolis, Brazil. Material and Methods: Clinical examination and questions to parents/guardians of 429 children aged 2-5 were conducted. The clinical examination was performed by three calibrated examiners to register the presence of tooth wear on incisors and molars. The questions were related to sleep bruxism (teeth grinding) and mouth breathing. For determinate diagnosis, were "possible" bruxism by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and "probable" bruxism, whereas the Item Response Theory was employed for mouth breathing. To determine the associations, a Chi-square test and Fisher exact test with a standard error of 5% and 95% interval confidence were applied. Results: The clinical examination revealed bruxism in 8.2%, whereas the parental report revealed bruxism in 17.2%. When clinical examination was associated with the parent's report, bruxism was present in 2.1%. Among the non-clinical variables, the most prevalent changes included: child presenting a regular stuffy nose (19.6%), followed by child is always open-mouthed (16.1%). A significant statistical association between bruxism and age was obtained (p<0.05), the age group with prevalence of 4 and 5 years old with 68.9%. There was no mouth breathing association with the presence of bruxism (p>0.05). Conclusion: Bruxism was prevalent for children aged 4-5 and bruxism had no association with mouth breathing.

Variables associated with mouth breathing diagnosis in children based on a multidisciplinary assessment / Variáveis associadas ao diagnóstico de respiração oral baseado em uma avaliação multidisciplinar

ABSTRACT Purpose : This study was conducted to identify variables associated with mouth breathing diagnosis in children, based on multidisciplinary domains. Methods 119 children, six to 12 years old, underwent anamnesis, speech therapy (orofacial structures and stomatognathic functions), otorhinolaryngologic (OTRL) with clinical and endoscopic examinations, dental (occlusion) and physiotherapy (body posture and nasal patency) assessments. Nasal patency was evaluated using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. A multiple logistic regression was performed considering breathing mode as the dependent variable and the co-variables from each multidisciplinary assessment as associated variables. Results Association with MB diagnosis was found in each professional domain with: nasal obstruction report (Odds ratio - OR=5.55), time of pacifier use (OR=1.25), convex facial type (OR=3.78), obtuse nasal angle (OR=4.30), half-open or open lip posture (OR=4.13), tongue position on the mouth floor (OR=5.88), reduced hard palate width (OR=2.99), unexpected contraction during mastication (OR=2.97), obstructive pharyngeal tonsils (OR=8.37), Angle Class II malocclusion (OR=10.85) and regular gingival maintenance (OR=2.89). Conclusion We concluded that a multidisciplinary diagnosis is important, given that each evaluation domain, including OTRL, dental and speech therapy, presented variables associated with MB diagnosis. Body posture and nasal patency variables were not associated with MB.

RESUMO Objetivo Este estudo foi conduzido para identificar as variáveis associadas ao diagnóstico de respiração oral em crianças, baseado nos domínios multidisciplinares. Método Cento e dezenove crianças, de seis a 12 anos, realizaram uma avaliação abrangente composta por uma anamnese e exames fonoaudiológico (estruturas orofaciais e funções estomatognáticas), otorrinolaringológico (avaliação clínica e endoscópica), odontológico (conservação oral e oclusão) e fisioterapêutico (postura corporal e permeabilidade nasal). A permeabilidade nasal foi aferida utilizando-se o Pico de Fluxo Inspiratório Nasal (PFIN) e a escala NOSE (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation). Foi realizada uma regressão logística múltipla, considerando o modo respiratório como variável dependente e as covariáveis de cada avaliação multidisciplinar como variáveis associadas. Resultados Foi encontrada uma associação do diagnóstico de respiração oral com variáveis de cada domínio profissional: relato de obstrução nasal (Odds ratio - OR=5,55), tempo de uso de chupeta (OR=1,25), tipo facial convexo (OR=3,78), ângulo nasolabial obtuso (OR=4,30), postura de lábios entreabertos e abertos (OR=4,13), postura de língua no assoalho oral (OR=5,88), largura do palato duro reduzida (OR=2,99), contrações inesperadas durante a mastigação (OR=2,97), tonsilas faríngeas obstrutivas (OR=8,37), má oclusão classe II de Angle (OR=10,85) e estado gengival regular (OR=2,89). Conclusão Concluiu-se que o diagnóstico multidisciplinar é importante, uma vez que as avaliações dos domínios fonoaudiológico, otorrinolaringológico e odontológico obtiveram variáveis associadas ao diagnóstico de respiração oral. As variáveis relacionadas à postura corporal e permeabilidade nasal não foram associadas ao diagnóstico de respiração oral.

Clinical recognition of mouth breathers by orthodontists: A preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: A routine diagnosis of a patient's breathing status performed by an orthodontist normally includes visual assessment, medical history, clinical examination of habitual lip posture, size and shape of the nostrils, reflex control of the alar muscle and respiratory tests, and the dental mirror test. The objective of this study was to test the recognition of mouth breathers in young persons by an orthodontist and agreement with an otolaryngologist's reference diagnosis when routine assessments were carried out. METHODS: Three independent and blind evaluations were conducted on the same day by 2 orthodontists independently (anamnesis and breathing tests, respectively) and an otolaryngologist (rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, and visual assessment). The weighted kappa coefficient was used to test intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement. The frequencies of answers and findings were reported for each breathing status. RESULTS: Fifty-five volunteers composed the sample of this study; 20 participants were nasal breathers, and 35 participants were classified as mouth breathers (and subdivided into mouth breathers with airway obstruction and mouth breathers by habit) by the otolaryngologist. The weighted kappa coefficient showed poor interrater agreement for most comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of mouth breathing in young persons by orthodontists is poor.

The clinical and radiological predictors of pulmonary hypertension in children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy.

Unrelieved upper airway obstruction from highly prevalent adenotonsillar hypertrophy (ATH) has the potential of producing structural remodelling of the pulmonary vascular bed with resultant pulmonary hypertension (PH) and cor pulmonale. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the local prevalence of PH and examine its clinical and radiological pointers among children with ATH. The airway obstruction was evaluated clinically by grading the nocturnal and daytime symptoms of ATH. A Brodsky scale and adenoid-nasopharynx ratio (AN ratio) were used to categorize tonsil and adenoid size, respectively. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), was measured noninvasively for each child using Doppler echocardiography and PH was defined by mPAP ≥25 mmHg. Comparison of symptom scores, tonsil and adenoid size and demographic factors was made between children with mPAP ≥25 mmHg and those mPAP <25 mmHg using univariate and multivariate analysis. There was 22.8 % (18/79) prevalence of PH among the 26 children with only adenoid hypertrophy and 53 with ATH. Significant risk factors identified by logistic regression analysis associated with PH were daytime mouth breathing, daytime stertor, and AN ratio >0.75 (P = 0.002, 0.018, and 0.04, respectively), with more than sixfold and fourfold increase risk for daytime mouth breathing and daytime stertor, respectively. Obstructive breathing during sleep was significant only on univariate analysis. Prolonged symptom duration ≥24 months, large tonsils (grades 3 and 4), snoring and mouth breathing during sleep were not significant. This study demonstrated that pulmonary hypertension remains prevalent in children with ATH. Daytime mouth breathing and stertor as well as AN ratio >0.75 are the prime predictors of pulmonary hypertension, with an AN ratio cut-off point of 0.73 on ROC analysis.

Tratamiento de luxación discal sin reducción: responsabilidad del odontopediatra / Treatment of disk displacement without reduction: the pediatric dentist´s responsibility

Actualmente, es frecuente la consulta por trastornos temporomandibulares (TTM) en la clínica odontopediátrica, siendo reconocida la múltiple causalidad de los mismos. Se presenta la resolución de una situación clínica de una paciente de 13 años de edad que acudió a la Cátedra de Odontología Integral Niños (OIN), presentando dolor muscular y articular del lado derecho, limitando la apertura bucal a 25 mm confortable y a 28 mm forzada, con desvío de la mandíbula hacia la izquierda. Refería haber sido atendida en una guardia médica el día anterior con bloqueo en apertura, luego de 8 meses de evolución, con síntomas de chasquido y doloir, sin haber realizado consulta alguna. Se indicó tratamiento sintomático y se solicitaron estudios complementarios. El diagnóstico fue de luxación discal sin reducción. Con la evaluación integral, se hallaron factores concomitantes, tales como maloclusión, hiperlaxitud, respiración bucal y parafunciones. En el abordaje terapéutico, se colocó un intermediario oclusal para reposicionamiento mandibular, se realizó tratamiento fonoaudiológico miofuncional y reeducación postural global (RPG). La paciente evolucionó favorablemente; a los 6 meses resolvió el ruido articular y al año estaba asintomática, con 37 mm de apertura, comenzando su tratamiento de ortodoncia y manteniendo controles durante 4 años. El compromiso de la familia y la participación de un equipo de trabajo, permitió la resolución integral del caso. El odontopediatra tiene la responsabilidad de alertar a padres y pacientes sobre factores de riesgo, diagnosticar TTM y orientar los tratamientos, involucrándose cuando corresponde su intervención, o derivando en forma oportuna...

Oropharyngeal Airway: The Orthodontist Perspective.

Dentofacial morphology can be altered by nasorespiratory obstruction depending on the magnitude, duration, and time of occurrence. More recent findings suggest that nasal-oral breathing per se is not necessarily harmful to craniofacial growth. However, in instances where the nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal airspace is small, exaggerated postural responses in obligatory mouth breathers may be detrimental to craniofacial growth. Extended head posture which was observed in mouth breathers is found to influence the position of the mandible. Deviated nasal septum , allergies, chronic infection , hypertrophied inferior turbinates, adenoidal pad, and faucial tonsils hypertrophies are the common etiologicalfactors affecting the pharyngeal airway. The orthodontist will be the first clinician to attend the child to observe any change in the breathing pattern such as mouth breathing during examination or during the treatment. The cause of nasal obstruction in children can usually be determined by a thorough history and physical exam. The goals of the evaluation are to determine specific causes ofproblems, the severity of the obstruction, and the presence of associated medical complications. Rapid expansion exerts its effect by dilating the anterior nares, through the preferential expansion of the anteroinferior aspect of the nasal cavity. A mean decrease in nasal resistance has been demonstrated after surgical maxillary impaction. Airway can be evaluated by physical examination, functional examination, and different imaging techniques such as CT MR, cephalometry, acoustic reflection, nasal pharyngoscopy, and fluoroscopy. A multidisciplinary approach involving orthodontist, oral and maxillo facial surgeon, ENT surgeon, and sleep study researchers is needed for management.

The influence of snoring, mouth breathing and apnoea on facial morphology in late childhood: a three-dimensional study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the prevalence of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and face shape morphology in a large cohort of 15-year-old children. DESIGN: Observational longitudinal cohort study SETTING: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), South West of England. PARTICIPANTS: Three-dimensional surface laser scans were taken for 4784 white British children from the ALSPAC during a follow-up clinic. A total of 1724 children with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and 1862 healthy children were identified via parents' report of sleep disordered symptoms for their children. We excluded from the original cohort all children identified as having congenital abnormalities, diagnoses associated with poor growth and children with adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parents in the ALSPAC reported sleep disordered symptoms (snoring, mouth breathing and apnoea) for their children at 6, 18, 30, 42, 57, 69 and 81 months. Average facial shells were created for children with and without SDB in order to explore surface differences. RESULTS: Differences in facial measurements were found between the children with and without SDB throughout early childhood. The mean differences included an increase in face height in SDB children of 0.3 mm (95% CI -0.52 to -0.05); a decrease in mandibular prominence of 0.9° (95% CI -1.30 to -0.42) in SDB children; and a decrease in nose prominence and width of 0.12 mm (95% CI 0.00 to 0.24) and 0.72 mm (95% CI -0.10 to -0.25), respectively, in SDB children. The odds of children exhibiting symptoms of SDB increased significantly with respect to increased face height and mandible angle, but reduced with increased nose width and prominence. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a long face, reduced nose prominence and width, and a retrognathic mandible may be diagnostic facial features of SBD that may warrant a referral to specialists for the evaluation of other clinical symptoms of SDB.

Guidelines proposal for clinical recognition of mouth breathing children.

INTRODUCTION: Mouth breathing (MB) is an etiological factor for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during childhood. The habit of breathing through the mouth may be perpetuated even after airway clearance. Both habit and obstruction may cause facial muscle imbalance and craniofacial changes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to propose and test guidelines for clinical recognition of MB and some predisposing factors for SDB in children. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 110 orthodontists regarding their procedures for clinical evaluation of MB and their knowledge about SDB during childhood. Thereafter, based on their answers, guidelines were developed and tested in 687 children aged between 6 and 12 years old and attending elementary schools. RESULTS: There was no standardization for clinical recognition of MB among orthodontists. The most common procedures performed were inefficient to recognize differences between MB by habit or obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines proposed herein facilitate clinical recognition of MB, help clinicians to differentiate between habit and obstruction, suggest the most appropriate treatment for each case, and avoid maintenance of mouth breathing patterns during adulthood.